Podcasts - SOLLOG - Thee End - Real Paranormal
SOLLOG The Greatest Mystic since Nostradamus
Author 100+ Books - Writer 100+ Songs
My opinion article on Wood V. Moss, a case in which the US Supreme court destroyed the right to protest, is now live at 1 LEGAL a legal news network. I will be commenting from time to tme on this site as to recent court decisions around the world. This is the link for my recent opinion article.
Since I’m the CHIEF JUDGE of the Supreme Counsel of TOH an international religious court and also the Chief Judge of the Supreme Court of the NATION OF ONE, I get to give my legal opinions on legal matters.
I’ve argued in every level of the US Court systems there is over the years.
City Municipal Courts, County and State trial courts, state appeals courts, several states supreme courts, numerous federal district courts, numerous federal appeals courts and even the US Supreme Court where a search of Adonai-Adoni turns up numerous civil rights cases I’ve done. Lexis Search Adonai-Adoni US Supreme Court.
I am considered by many to be one of the greatest legal minds in history since my knowledge takes into account legal precedent in my filings not just in modern law, but so-called common law from which modern law courts evolved and even ancient law as well as rabbinical and biblical law.
I can go toe to toe with any Judge and put them in their place as to how their decisions are against basic human rights concepts and civil rights or democracy.
The courts are more and more leaning towards a Supocracy in which the rulers or leaders who own huge companies have all the rights.
The little person is being trampled upon not only in US courts but courts around the world.
The concept of ‘equal rights’ is that, a concept that the courts hate.
The crew in black robes that are stealing basic human and civil rights from the masses have no real understanding of law, they base their ‘opinions’ on precedent, and for years precedents have been given to turn clear words into meaningless ideals.
“Well the US Constitution says this, but this judge in this case decided it really meant this”, that is the logic of the bastards in robes that chip away at basic rights.